{"id":205,"date":"2026-07-16T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-07-16T09:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rlxsolutions.com\/blog\/prototype-pcb-manufacturing\/"},"modified":"2026-07-16T09:00:00","modified_gmt":"2026-07-16T09:00:00","slug":"prototype-pcb-manufacturing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rlxsolutions.com\/blog\/prototype-pcb-manufacturing\/","title":{"rendered":"Prototype PCB Manufacturing: From First Build to Production"},"content":{"rendered":"

\n Prototype PCB manufacturing<\/a> turns a design into hardware that can expose electrical,
\n mechanical and manufacturing problems before they multiply at volume. RLX Solutions<\/a>,
\n a contract electronics manufacturer in Concord, Ontario, treats the first build as the
\n beginning of a controlled path toward repeatable production, not as an isolated batch
\n of working boards.\n <\/p>\n

\n The difference matters. A prototype can power up correctly and still carry problems
\n that become expensive at 500 or 5,000 pieces: marginal drill geometry, difficult
\n assembly access, a component with weak supply continuity, an unproven test method,
\n or fabrication notes that leave too much open to interpretation.\n <\/p>\n

\n A useful prototype therefore answers two questions at once: does the circuit work,
\n and can the same design be built repeatedly?\n <\/p>\n

Prototype manufacturing should test the process as well as the circuit<\/h2>\n

\n A prototype is a low-volume build used to validate a design before production
\n quantities are committed. A bare PCB is the fabricated circuit board before
\n components are installed. Once components are placed and soldered, the result is a
\n printed circuit board assembly<\/a>, commonly shortened to PCBA.\n <\/p>\n

\n Those distinctions matter because fabrication, assembly and functional validation
\n can expose different failures.\n <\/p>\n

\n A fabrication problem may appear as an impedance deviation, an unsuitable via
\n structure or a stackup that cannot be produced as drawn. An assembly problem may
\n come from paste deposition, package geometry or polarity documentation. A functional
\n problem may not appear until firmware is loaded and the board operates under realistic
\n electrical conditions.\n <\/p>\n

\n Treating prototype PCB manufacturing as a miniature production exercise gives the
\n engineering team more useful evidence than asking only whether five boards turn on.\n <\/p>\n

\n That does not mean freezing every production detail before the first build. Early
\n prototypes still exist to support change. It means recording the assumptions that
\n matter later: stackup, laminate, copper, drill structure, finish, bill of materials,
\n assembly revision, programming method and test criteria.\n <\/p>\n

The first build should produce information, not just hardware<\/h3>\n

\n Suppose an eight-layer control board reaches the bench and all five prototypes pass
\n functional test. That result confirms something important, but it does not answer
\n every production question.\n <\/p>\n

\n If two connectors were manually adjusted during assembly, a substitute regulator
\n was purchased for the prototype lot, and test technicians probed convenient component
\n leads because formal test points do not exist, those five passing boards have
\n identified three production tasks rather than completed the validation cycle.\n <\/p>\n

\n The design may be electrically sound while the manufacturing process is still unfinished.\n <\/p>\n

Start with fabrication choices that can survive the next quantity break<\/h2>\n

\n PCB fabrication<\/a> converts the released manufacturing data into the physical board
\n through imaging, lamination, drilling, plating, solder mask, surface finishing and
\n electrical verification. Choices made before the first prototype affect how many
\n of those operations the board requires.\n <\/p>\n

\n Layer count alone is therefore a weak predictor of manufacturing difficulty.\n <\/p>\n

Consider two hypothetical 10-layer boards:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Decision factor<\/th>\nBoard A<\/th>\nBoard B<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Layer count<\/td>\n10 layers<\/td>\n10 layers<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Via structure<\/td>\nThrough vias only<\/td>\n\n Layer 1 to 2 microvias, Layer 2 to 3 microvias, buried vias between inner layers\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Lamination<\/td>\nConventional multilayer build sequence<\/td>\nSequential lamination required by blind and microvia structures<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Via-in-pad<\/td>\nNone<\/td>\nFilled and capped pads under selected components<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Manufacturing effect<\/td>\nFewer dependent operations<\/td>\nMore drilling, filling, plating and lamination dependencies<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Main engineering question<\/td>\nCan through vias meet routing density?<\/td>\nIs the added density worth the added process sequence?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\n The two boards have the same layer count, but Board B can cost more because its
\n interconnect architecture creates more manufacturing stages. A blind via terminates
\n on an internal layer rather than passing through the entire board, so the relevant
\n layers must be built and processed in a sequence that allows the hole to be formed
\n and plated before the remaining stack is completed.\n <\/p>\n

\n A microvia is a laser-drilled small-diameter interconnect used for dense layer-to-layer
\n routing. When it lands in a component pad, resin fill, copper capping and planarization
\n can become part of the manufacturing sequence so the assembly surface remains suitable
\n for soldering.\n <\/p>\n

\n That is why an engineer should ask how the via structure changes the process, not
\n simply how many layers are in the stack.\n <\/p>\n

Hole diameter and board thickness belong in the same decision<\/h3>\n

\n Aspect ratio is the relationship between hole depth and drilled diameter. As a plated
\n hole becomes deeper relative to its diameter, achieving consistent copper deposition
\n through the barrel becomes more demanding.\n <\/p>\n

\n Take a hypothetical 1.6 mm thick board.\n <\/p>\n

\n A 0.20 mm through hole produces an 8:1 thickness-to-hole relationship. Reducing the
\n hole to 0.15 mm on the same 1.6 mm board pushes that relationship to roughly 10.7:1.\n <\/p>\n

\n That change may look small in the CAD tool, but it changes the fabrication problem.
\n One option is to reconsider the finished board thickness or hole diameter. Another is
\n to change the interconnect architecture rather than forcing one small mechanical drill
\n through the full stack.\n <\/p>\n

\n Within RLX fabrication, the standard maximum aspect ratio is 10:1, with 12:1 scoped
\n per project. The minimum mechanical plated through-hole drill is 0.15 mm, while
\n laser-drilled microvias can reach 0.10 mm. Those values should be evaluated together
\n rather than treated as unrelated entries on a fabrication drawing.\n <\/p>\n

Use prototype DFM to remove avoidable production constraints<\/h2>\n

\n Design for manufacturability, or DFM, is the process of reviewing a design against
\n the way it will actually be fabricated and assembled. Good DFM does more than detect
\n a hard process violation. It identifies design choices that consume manufacturing
\n margin without delivering useful electrical or mechanical benefit.\n <\/p>\n

\n That distinction becomes more important as quantity rises.\n <\/p>\n

\n A prototype may justify a dense escape pattern because the layout is still being
\n validated. Once the design stabilizes, a second review can ask whether every narrow
\n trace, small drill or complex via remains necessary.\n <\/p>\n

\n For example, imagine a six-layer board using 3 mil trace and 3 mil spacing in one
\n congested processor escape region while the remaining routing has significantly more
\n room. Preserving the fine geometry only where density requires it gives manufacturing
\n more latitude elsewhere than forcing the complete design toward the densest feature.\n <\/p>\n

\n Copper weight changes the same calculation. On a two-layer board with 1 oz outer
\n copper, 3 mil trace and 3 mil spacing is within the stated fabrication envelope.
\n Moving the design to 2 oz copper changes the listed trace and spacing value to
\n 6 mil \/ 6 mil. The added conductor thickness affects the etching problem, so a layout
\n that worked at one copper weight should not be assumed to transfer unchanged to another.\n <\/p>\n

\n The production question is not whether a fabricator can make the hardest feature
\n once. It is whether that feature still deserves to exist across every board in the lot.\n <\/p>\n

The prototype BOM is already a production document<\/h2>\n

\n The bill of materials, or BOM, defines what must be purchased and installed. During
\n prototyping it is tempting to treat sourcing as a temporary problem because the
\n immediate objective is to obtain enough parts for a handful of boards.\n <\/p>\n

\n That can create a false sense of design maturity.\n <\/p>\n

\n A footprint may be correct while its selected component is approaching end of life.
\n A processor may work perfectly while supply is allocated. An apparently interchangeable
\n substitute may differ in temperature range, package variant or another parameter that
\n matters to the finished product.\n <\/p>\n

\n Production readiness therefore requires the engineering and procurement teams to
\n resolve both electrical suitability and sourcing identity.\n <\/p>\n

\n Useful BOM data should remove ambiguity around manufacturer, manufacturer part number
\n and any permitted substitutions. Critical or long-lead components also need a sourcing
\n decision before a pilot lot creates pressure to accept a replacement simply because
\n it is available.\n <\/p>\n

\n Counterfeit risk enters the same discussion when a required part moves outside normal
\n authorized supply. Authenticity controls can include source vetting, package and
\n date-code inspection, visual inspection, lot verification, X-ray and electrical
\n testing, with further analysis where the risk justifies it.\n <\/p>\n

\n The principle is simple: a working prototype does not prove that its component supply
\n path can support production.\n <\/p>\n

Assembly turns layout decisions into process behaviour<\/h2>\n

\n Surface mount technology (SMT), through-hole assembly and mixed-technology builds
\n translate PCB geometry into soldering and placement operations. Once the bare board
\n reaches assembly, features that looked acceptable on screen begin interacting with
\n stencil apertures, solder paste, component packages, reflow and inspection.\n <\/p>\n

\n A dense package makes this visible.\n <\/p>\n

\n Imagine a hypothetical board with a 0.5 mm pitch ball grid array beside several
\n 0201 passives. The board may be electrically correct, but production planning still
\n has to address paste deposition, pad geometry, component orientation, inspection
\n access and any test strategy for joints that cannot be seen directly.\n <\/p>\n

\n At finer geometry, inspection becomes part of the process design rather than a final
\n cosmetic check.\n <\/p>\n

\n Solder paste inspection (SPI) measures deposited paste before reflow. Automated
\n optical inspection (AOI) examines assembled surfaces after reflow. Automated X-ray
\n inspection (AXI) can evaluate hidden joints beneath packages such as BGAs, land grid
\n arrays and quad-flat no-lead devices.\n <\/p>\n

\n The relevant lesson from the prototype is not simply that the parts were placed
\n successfully. It is whether the manufacturing and inspection sequence can detect
\n the defects you care about before the build reaches volume.\n <\/p>\n

Via-in-pad affects assembly as well as fabrication<\/h3>\n

\n A via placed directly in a surface-mount pad creates an interaction between fabrication
\n and soldering. If the via remains open, solder can migrate into the hole during
\n assembly and reduce the solder volume available at the joint.\n <\/p>\n

\n Filled and capped via-in-pad addresses that mechanism by closing and planarizing the
\n feature before assembly.\n <\/p>\n

\n This is why high-density interconnect<\/a> choices cannot be reviewed only by the PCB
\n layout team. The fabrication method changes the solderable surface presented to assembly.\n <\/p>\n

Build the test strategy before the pilot lot<\/h2>\n

\n Testing becomes harder to retrofit after routing, component placement and mechanical
\n constraints are fixed.\n <\/p>\n

\n Flying-probe in-circuit testing can suit prototype and low-volume work because it can
\n access electrical nets without a dedicated bed-of-nails fixture. At production
\n quantities, fixture-based in-circuit testing may become appropriate where the product
\n and programme justify it. Functional test then evaluates the assembled board against
\n the customer’s required operating behaviour.\n <\/p>\n

\n These methods answer different questions.\n <\/p>\n

\n Electrical net testing can find opens and shorts. In-circuit testing can exercise
\n accessible nodes and component-level conditions. Functional testing verifies that
\n the finished assembly performs the required function under the defined test procedure.\n <\/p>\n

\n A board that passes one category has not automatically passed the others.\n <\/p>\n

\n Consider a hypothetical motor-control board with 140 accessible electrical nets.
\n During the first build, flying probe can cover those nets without committing to a
\n production fixture. If the design later enters a 2,000-piece production programme,
\n the team can decide whether fixture-based test offers enough repeatability and
\n throughput to justify locking test access into the design.\n <\/p>\n

\n If that discussion starts only after the pilot build, mechanical placement may already
\n have consumed the accessible locations.\n <\/p>\n

First article approval is the gate between intent and repetition<\/h2>\n

\n A first article is the initial build inspected against the released design and
\n manufacturing requirements before the larger production lot is released. Its purpose
\n is to prove that the documented process produced the intended assembly.\n <\/p>\n

\n This is a different milestone from receiving an early engineering prototype.\n <\/p>\n

\n A prototype can still carry temporary substitutions, hand modifications or open design
\n questions. A production first article should correspond to the revision that
\n procurement, manufacturing, inspection and test are expected to repeat.\n <\/p>\n

\n That makes revision control central to the handoff.\n <\/p>\n

\n If the schematic is Rev C, the Gerbers are Rev D, the BOM still contains a Rev B
\n component substitution and the assembly drawing was exported before a connector
\n orientation changed, the problem is no longer circuit design. It is configuration control.\n <\/p>\n

\n Production cannot reproduce an engineering decision that exists only in an email
\n thread or on one engineer’s bench.\n <\/p>\n

Use a pilot build to expose quantity-dependent problems<\/h2>\n

\n A pilot build sits between prototype validation and sustained production. It gives
\n the team enough units to exercise the process repeatedly without immediately committing
\n the full production quantity.\n <\/p>\n

\n For bare boards, the documented manufacturing ranges are 5-PCB minimum for prototypes,
\n 25 to 500 PCBs for pilot quantities and 500 to 50,000+ PCBs for production. The point
\n of the middle stage is more important than its label: repeat the design enough times
\n to expose process, documentation, sourcing and test weaknesses that a tiny engineering
\n batch may not reveal.\n <\/p>\n

\n A pilot can show whether operators interpret assembly notes consistently, whether
\n inspection criteria are usable, whether programming data stays tied to serial identity,
\n and whether the selected component supply route behaves as expected.\n <\/p>\n

\n It can also expose interactions between processes.\n <\/p>\n

\n For example, a conformal-coated assembly may pass electrical test before coating while
\n later service access, masking requirements or connector protection create a new
\n production concern. A board requiring firmware programming needs the correct file
\n revision and programming interface tied to the released manufacturing package, not a
\n laptop folder maintained by one developer.\n <\/p>\n

\n The pilot is where these supporting processes become part of the build definition.\n <\/p>\n

Production readiness is a controlled-data problem<\/h2>\n

\n Scaling from a prototype to production works best when the manufacturer receives one
\n coherent release package.\n <\/p>\n

For PCB fabrication, that package can include:<\/p>\n

    \n
  • Gerber RS-274X, ODB++ or IPC-2581 manufacturing data<\/li>\n
  • NC drill files<\/li>\n
  • Stackup information<\/li>\n
  • Impedance targets where controlled impedance is required<\/li>\n
  • Fabrication notes<\/li>\n
  • Board revision identification<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    For assembly, add:<\/p>\n

      \n
    • BOM in spreadsheet or CSV format<\/li>\n
    • Pick-and-place or centroid data<\/li>\n
    • Assembly drawing<\/li>\n
    • Programming files and instructions where required<\/li>\n
    • Test requirements and acceptance criteria<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      \n Each file answers a different manufacturing question. Gerber or equivalent data defines
      \n the physical artwork. The drill file defines hole locations and tooling instructions.
      \n The BOM defines component identity. Pick-and-place data defines machine placement
      \n coordinates. The assembly drawing communicates information that cannot safely be
      \n inferred from coordinates alone.\n <\/p>\n

      \n Leaving one part ambiguous forces somebody downstream to make a decision that should
      \n have belonged to engineering.\n <\/p>\n

      Controlled impedance needs a target, not a note saying “impedance controlled”<\/h3>\n

      \n Controlled impedance is the management of trace geometry and stackup so a transmission
      \n line meets a specified electrical impedance. The fabricator needs the target and the
      \n applicable structure so material thickness, copper geometry and processing can be
      \n coordinated.\n <\/p>\n

      \n Within the stated fabrication capability, controlled impedance is held to \u00b110%, with
      \n tighter than \u00b15% handled against the specific project. Time-domain reflectometry (TDR)
      \n can be performed on a coupon, with the corresponding test report supplied with the order.\n <\/p>\n

      \n For the engineer, the production lesson is that impedance belongs to the stackup
      \n definition. Changing laminate, dielectric thickness or copper geometry after prototype
      \n validation can change the electrical structure even if the routing coordinates remain
      \n identical.\n <\/p>\n

      Prototype and production cost respond to different design decisions<\/h2>\n

      \n Prototype cost carries the effect of engineering setup across very few boards.
      \n Production distributes fixed preparation across more units but becomes more sensitive
      \n to repeatable process time, material usage, test strategy and yield risk.\n <\/p>\n

      \n That is why cutting the prototype unit price can work against the larger programme.\n <\/p>\n

      \n Consider again the two hypothetical 10-layer boards. Board A uses through vias.
      \n Board B uses multiple microvia levels, buried structures and via-in-pad fill and cap.
      \n Ordering 10 pieces instead of 1,000 changes the arithmetic, but it does not remove
      \n Board B’s additional manufacturing sequence.\n <\/p>\n

      \n Likewise, choosing a difficult-to-source component because five units are available
      \n today may solve the prototype schedule while creating a procurement problem at 500 units.\n <\/p>\n

      \n The better cost question is therefore not, “How cheaply can this prototype be built?”
      \n It is, “Which prototype decisions are teaching us something necessary, and which ones
      \n are creating recurring production cost?”\n <\/p>\n

      Keep quality requirements attached to the build revision<\/h2>\n

      \n IPC requirements affect the workmanship and acceptance criteria applied to fabricated
      \n and assembled boards. IPC-6012 addresses rigid printed circuit board fabrication,
      \n while IPC-A-610 addresses acceptability of electronic assemblies.\n <\/p>\n

      \n Class 3 imposes tighter fabrication and workmanship expectations than Class 2. The
      \n practical consequence is not simply another label on the purchase order. Requirements
      \n such as annular ring, plating, solder-joint acceptance, documentation and inspection
      \n need to be carried into the manufacturing plan from the start.\n <\/p>\n

      \n A prototype intended to qualify a future Class 3 design should therefore be reviewed
      \n with that destination in mind. Discovering after validation that the production build
      \n will use materially different acceptance criteria weakens the value of the prototype
      \n evidence.\n <\/p>\n

      \n The same reasoning applies to inspection and traceability. Prototype flexibility is
      \n useful while the design is changing. Once the design enters production, documented
      \n revision identity, lot information, test records and first-article approval become
      \n part of controlling repetition.\n <\/p>\n

      Move to production only when the exceptions have disappeared<\/h2>\n

      \n A production-ready board is not a prototype that happened to pass. It is a design
      \n whose important exceptions have been resolved or deliberately documented.\n <\/p>\n

      Before releasing the next quantity, verify that:<\/p>\n

        \n
      1. \n The schematic, layout, fabrication data, BOM and assembly drawing identify the same revision.\n <\/li>\n
      2. \n Fabrication choices such as stackup, copper, via architecture and controlled impedance
        \n reflect the intended production design.\n <\/li>\n
      3. \n Prototype substitutions have been removed from the released BOM or formally approved.\n <\/li>\n
      4. \n Component supply has been considered at the next planned quantity.\n <\/li>\n
      5. \n Assembly instructions cover polarity, special processes and any manual operations
        \n that cannot be inferred safely.\n <\/li>\n
      6. \n Programming and functional-test procedures are controlled documents rather than bench knowledge.\n <\/li>\n
      7. \n Inspection methods match the packages and workmanship requirements on the assembly.\n <\/li>\n
      8. \n The first article represents the configuration that the production lot will repeat.\n <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        \n A five-board prototype with three undocumented workarounds is less ready for production
        \n than a board that required one more engineering revision but eliminated those exceptions.\n <\/p>\n

        \n That is the real handoff criterion.\n <\/p>\n

        Send one manufacturing package, not a collection of assumptions<\/h2>\n

        \n If your circuit board is moving from engineering hardware toward a pilot or production
        \n release, RLX can review the manufacturing package as part of the quoting process.
        \n Send the fabrication data, BOM, pick-and-place information and relevant drawings so
        \n fabrication, sourcing, assembly and test requirements can be evaluated against the
        \n same revision.\n <\/p>\n

        \n

        Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n

        How many PCB prototypes should I order before production?<\/h3>\n

        \n There is no universal prototype quantity that proves production readiness. The build
        \n should be large enough to validate the design, assembly method and test approach for
        \n the risks in your product. A second revision may be more useful than increasing the
        \n quantity of a first revision if the initial build exposes layout, sourcing or
        \n documentation changes.\n <\/p>\n

        What files are needed for prototype PCB manufacturing?<\/h3>\n

        \n For bare board fabrication, provide manufacturing data such as Gerber RS-274X,
        \n ODB++ or IPC-2581 files plus NC drill data. Stackup information, impedance targets
        \n and fabrication notes should accompany them where relevant. Assembly adds a BOM,
        \n pick-and-place data and an assembly drawing. Programming or functional testing also
        \n requires the applicable files and instructions.\n <\/p>\n

        Is a successful prototype automatically ready for PCB production?<\/h3>\n

        \n No. A prototype can function correctly while still depending on temporary
        \n substitutions, manual rework, informal test methods or unresolved manufacturing
        \n choices. Production readiness requires the released data, component supply,
        \n fabrication process, assembly instructions, inspection plan and test method to
        \n describe a repeatable build rather than the exceptions used to make an engineering
        \n sample work.\n <\/p>\n

        Should prototype and production boards use the same stackup?<\/h3>\n

        \n Keeping the validated stackup can reduce variables, especially where controlled
        \n impedance or high-speed behaviour depends on dielectric and copper geometry.
        \n If the production stackup changes, the electrical and manufacturing effects should
        \n be reviewed rather than assuming the new construction is equivalent because the
        \n copper routing artwork stayed the same.\n <\/p>\n

        When should component sourcing be reviewed for production?<\/h3>\n

        \n Start during prototype development. The BOM should identify the intended manufacturer
        \n parts and any approved alternatives before quantity creates schedule pressure.
        \n Long-lead, obsolete, allocated or authenticity-sensitive parts can affect production
        \n even when enough stock exists to complete the first engineering build.\n <\/p>\n

        What is the purpose of a pilot PCB build?<\/h3>\n

        \n A pilot build tests repetition. It can expose documentation gaps, process variation,
        \n sourcing issues, programming problems and test limitations that may not appear in a
        \n very small prototype batch. It also gives the team a controlled point to verify that
        \n the released design and manufacturing process are ready before committing a larger
        \n production lot.\n <\/p>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

        Prototype PCB manufacturing turns a design into hardware that can expose electrical, mechanical and manufacturing problems before they multiply at […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":204,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-205","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-pcb-manufacturing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rlxsolutions.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rlxsolutions.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rlxsolutions.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rlxsolutions.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rlxsolutions.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=205"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rlxsolutions.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rlxsolutions.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/204"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rlxsolutions.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=205"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rlxsolutions.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=205"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rlxsolutions.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=205"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}